Comparing business models

Alex Osterwalder
August 1, 2017
#
 min read
topics
Business Models
Business Model Innovation
Business Strategy

Vijaya Thyil and Geoffrey Durden from La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia invited me to contribute to a quantitative study on business models of Australian companies.

I found this quite interesting and accepted the invitation because I think it will help us better compare business models and maybe it will even lead to identifying patterns of business model success.

In a quick brainstorming session I came up with some ideas for different scales for each of the 9 business model building blocks which I use to map a company's business model. These scales can help describe the characteristics of each business model building block of a company in a more quantitative way.

The whole set of variables of the 9 building blocks will then give us a representation of the entire business model. If we combine this representations with measures of success, such as profit growth or stock performance we might be able to find particular patters.

For example, we might find that the business models of successful companies are characterized by decentralized and diversified distribution channels. Or, we might find that business models focusing on niche markets are more successful than business models focusing on mass markets... and so on.

Here the set of scales for the building blocks that I came up with during my brainstorming:

Value Proposition

  • low cost/value - high cost/value
  • follower (e.g. mass market MP3 players) - innovator (e.g. MySpace.com)

Customer Segments

  • niche markets (e.g. long tail) - mass markets

Distribution Channels

  • reliance on owned channels (e.g. retail stores) - reliance on partner channels (e.g. affiliation)
  • centralized - decentralized

Customer Relationship

  • owned/direct relationship (e.g. Dell) - partner/indirect relationship (e.g. Nokia)
  • transactional - relational

Value Activities/Configuration

  • owned activities - distributed activities (e.g. Cisco)
  • simple activities - complex activities

Core Capabilities

  • self-reliance (e.g. Telcos own their network) - dependent (e.g. Skype relies on Internet infrastructure)
  • centralized - decentralized

Partnerships

  • few partners - complex value webs

Cost structure

  • lean (e.g. Dell) - fat (e.g. Pharma)

Revenue Streams

  • limited (e.g. Google from advertising, Pharma from blockbusters) - diversified (e.g. General Electric)
  • controlled - uncontrolled

Of course these are just some uncooked ideas that really would need some more thinking. However, I think this approach could help to find some interesting patterns in business model comparison.

In general I also find the theme of how much a company controls the building blocks of its business model interesting. 

For example, eBay does not entirely control what (value) is offered on its platform (except for eliminating some illegal offers). Most companies do not control the communities that discuss their products. Sales are increasingly made through marginally controlled affiliates.

Take the example of Skype which does not control the infrastructure through which its services are delivered. This theme of loss of control for each business model building block in comparison with performance could also be something to measure in research.

related reads

No items found.

About the speakers

Alex Osterwalder
Entrepreneur, speaker and business theorist

Dr. Alexander (Alex) Osterwalder is one of the world’s most influential innovation experts, a leading author, entrepreneur and in-demand speaker whose work has changed the way established companies do business and how new ventures get started.

by 
Alex Osterwalder
August 1, 2017
Share

Download your free copy of this whitepaper now

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
related reads

Explore more innovation insights in our knowledge library

Read our blog
No items found.
Team member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatar
Let's talk
Whether you’re looking for more information or you’re ready to start a project, we’re ready to help.
Thanks for your interest in our solutions. We will be in touch with you soon.
Comparing business models
Insights

Comparing business models

August 1, 2017
#
 min read
topics
Business Models
Business Model Innovation
Business Strategy

Vijaya Thyil and Geoffrey Durden from La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia invited me to contribute to a quantitative study on business models of Australian companies.

I found this quite interesting and accepted the invitation because I think it will help us better compare business models and maybe it will even lead to identifying patterns of business model success.

In a quick brainstorming session I came up with some ideas for different scales for each of the 9 business model building blocks which I use to map a company's business model. These scales can help describe the characteristics of each business model building block of a company in a more quantitative way.

The whole set of variables of the 9 building blocks will then give us a representation of the entire business model. If we combine this representations with measures of success, such as profit growth or stock performance we might be able to find particular patters.

For example, we might find that the business models of successful companies are characterized by decentralized and diversified distribution channels. Or, we might find that business models focusing on niche markets are more successful than business models focusing on mass markets... and so on.

Here the set of scales for the building blocks that I came up with during my brainstorming:

Value Proposition

  • low cost/value - high cost/value
  • follower (e.g. mass market MP3 players) - innovator (e.g. MySpace.com)

Customer Segments

  • niche markets (e.g. long tail) - mass markets

Distribution Channels

  • reliance on owned channels (e.g. retail stores) - reliance on partner channels (e.g. affiliation)
  • centralized - decentralized

Customer Relationship

  • owned/direct relationship (e.g. Dell) - partner/indirect relationship (e.g. Nokia)
  • transactional - relational

Value Activities/Configuration

  • owned activities - distributed activities (e.g. Cisco)
  • simple activities - complex activities

Core Capabilities

  • self-reliance (e.g. Telcos own their network) - dependent (e.g. Skype relies on Internet infrastructure)
  • centralized - decentralized

Partnerships

  • few partners - complex value webs

Cost structure

  • lean (e.g. Dell) - fat (e.g. Pharma)

Revenue Streams

  • limited (e.g. Google from advertising, Pharma from blockbusters) - diversified (e.g. General Electric)
  • controlled - uncontrolled

Of course these are just some uncooked ideas that really would need some more thinking. However, I think this approach could help to find some interesting patterns in business model comparison.

In general I also find the theme of how much a company controls the building blocks of its business model interesting. 

For example, eBay does not entirely control what (value) is offered on its platform (except for eliminating some illegal offers). Most companies do not control the communities that discuss their products. Sales are increasingly made through marginally controlled affiliates.

Take the example of Skype which does not control the infrastructure through which its services are delivered. This theme of loss of control for each business model building block in comparison with performance could also be something to measure in research.

related reads
No items found.
Comparing business models

Vijaya Thyil and Geoffrey Durden from La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia invited me to contribute to a quantitative study on business models of Australian companies.

Thanks for your interest in 
Comparing business models
Comparing business models
ONLINE COURSe

Read more
Team member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatarTeam member avatar
Let's talk
Whether you’re looking for more information or you’re ready to start a project, we’re ready to help.
Thanks for your interest in our solutions. We will be in touch with you soon.